| Author |
Message |
akontra
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 13
Location: Melbourne
|
Posted:
Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:07 pm |
  |
Hi there everyone - can I please have some advice.
I do a lot of ballroom dancing photography of my children. I use Canon 350D with the kit 75-300 telephoto. The conditions are obviously difficult - fast movement in poorly-lit environment - most of the time some distance away and needing the full range of the telephoto lens.
To be able to stop the action I use ISO800, with exposure in the 1/125 to 1/160th.
When I get the right "alignment of stars", the results I get are very decent. However, the rate of rejections is extremely high, as most shots end up being anywhere from a little soft to quite a bit out of focus.
The autofocus obviously is having a hard time coping with these conditions.
I've tried different autofocus settings, but still have not come up with a way to improve my success rate. The movement is too fast for me to be able to effectively use manual focus.
Does anyone have any pearls of wisdom to experiment with? Is this an issue with my hardware? Would using more expensive lenses for example produce more precise focussing?
Many tnx in anticipation. |
_________________ akontra |
|
  |
 |
jra
Joined: 01 Oct 2005
Posts: 183
|
Posted:
Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:21 pm |
  |
Well, you're working with a difficult situation. Low light makes it tough for autofocus to nail it spot on, not to mention that your shutter speeds are also a bit slow for a long lens coupled with motion (a minimum of 1/500 would greatly help to freeze motion). With what you've got, you're probably getting the best you can get. To improve your keeper rate in a situation like this, faster glass would be your best bet. Faster glass would give you a brighter viewfinder and improve autofocus plus it would give you faster shutter speeds. |
|
|
  |
 |
mrcoons

Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Posts: 55
Location: Illinois, USA
|
Posted:
Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:53 am |
  |
I agree with jra, faster glass is the answer here. I'd recommend the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 lens. Not as much reach what you are using but from 200mm prices start to increase dramatically.
I shoot the non IS version of this lens and can hand hold it with few problems. A monopod might help some or consider the more expensive version that does have IS. |
_________________ Mark
Music Man5 Photos
Blog
Flickr site |
|
     |
 |
Bryansix
Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 214
Location: Corona, CA
|
Posted:
Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:47 pm |
  |
Two things. Faster glass and the Canon 40D. The 40D can supposedly go up to 1600 ISO and still look decent. In fact it goes to 3200 but it looks funky on that setting. |
_________________ Canon Digital Rebel XT (350D)
Canon EOS A2E (Film)
EF-S 17-85mm F/4-5.6 IS USM
EF 50mm F/1.8 II
EF 70-200MM F/4L |
|
   |
 |
|
|