| Author |
Message |
ChrisL
Premium Member
Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 5395
Location: Chicago, IL
|
 Posted:
Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:02 pm |
  |
|
      |
|
JKSeidel
Joined: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 329
Location: Miami, FL USA
|
| Posted:
Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:41 am |
|
Almost $37,000 (USD) for the sports model. That pretty much cured my drooling problem. Sigh. |
_________________
Canon 20D
24-105mm L IS, 100-400mm L IS, 70-300mm
Canon 580 EX, Better Beamer, Lumiquest Promax
Gitzo 1325, RRS BH-55, Wimberley Sidekick |
|
|
|
discofish
Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 282
Location: Relocated
|
| Posted:
Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:37 pm |
|
I'm gonna get one of each model. My landscape pics are gonna be pretty pricey :) |
_________________
some of my pics can be seen on the photo gallery pages of impiani and
watercolours |
|
|
|
timeXlost
Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 103
Location: bridgewater ma
|
| Posted:
Thu Sep 21, 2006 7:22 pm |
|
wow...that thing is tiny! |
|
|
|
|
EOS MAN
Premium Member
Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 1254
Location: Clearwater, FL
|
| Posted:
Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:09 pm |
|
Yeah, I'll pass on that bill. I think I will stick with my 350D for now. |
_________________
Bernard
EOS MAN
Canon EOS Rebel XT
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8
Canon 580 EX
Sekonic L28c
Targus Battery Grip
Manfrotto 679 Monopod . . . |
|
|
|
spazoid1965
Joined: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 248
Location: Cottonwood Shores, TX
|
| Posted:
Thu Oct 05, 2006 11:23 pm |
|
This thing is the size of an accordian. |
_________________
Feel free to edit my photos and repost them HERE. I need all the help I can get. Just don't use them anywhere else. |
|
|
|
benmurphyphoto
Joined: 28 Oct 2006
Posts: 1
|
| Posted:
Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:34 am |
|
|
|
|
WandaH
Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 2
Location: Texas
|
| Posted:
Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:30 am |
|
I WISH I could get that camera. :) It does look a little unreal though, ha! |
_________________
Wanda G Harrell |
|
 |
|
Q8T
Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 152
|
| Posted:
Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:09 am |
|
You mean compare between that camera and a film equivalent ..
Take into account that you will need a Cray supercomputer to be fast enough to process these images and the amount of storage you need ...
Now, to take candid shots with it ...
No thx :p |
|
|
|
|
ironsidephoto
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Posts: 6
Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas
|
| Posted:
Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:20 am |
|
that thing is a bit ridiculous (and alittle pricey)
imagine in a decade when cell phone cameras are 160mp. . . haha. |
_________________
http://ironsidephotography.com
Criticism always welcome |
|
|
|
|
|
