| Author |
Message |
Harpua

Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 160
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 8:07 am |
  |
This weekend I had a family Bar Mitzvah to attend. I decided this would be a great time to try shooting RAW for the first time. I can not believe it took me this long to try. I think I was just intimidated because I did not know what software to use and the thought of trying to learn another photo editing program was overwhelming.
Well people here suggested Raw Shooter Essentials so that is what I used. I read through the manual and realized it was very easy to learn and not anywhere near as difficult as I thought it was going to be.
The control I now have over my photos is amazing. I am upset with myself for taking this long to take the plunge. I sort of feel like I have been driving a Ferrari in first gear because I was too intimidated to learn how to shift.
Well I am just glad I finally did it. I will never again shoot in jpg. What a world of difference!
Now I just need to worth on my other photo skills to get up to a level that I can compete with you guys. That gives me something to shoot for (no pun intended). |
|
|
   |
 |
adorski
Premium Member

Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 3834
Location: North Hollywood California
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 8:09 am |
  |
|
     |
 |
PeterRoweBlackman
Moderator

Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 3619
Location: Warrington, Cheshire, England
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 8:30 am |
  |
Welcome to the club
PRB
B-) |
_________________ Nikon D80+grip
Nikon D50+grip
Nikon 18-70,
Nikon 50mm f1.8,
Sigma 70-300mmD 1:4-5.6APO,
Nikon SB600 (2 of)
Various accessories
Pentax MX + 50mmf1.7 + 70-150mm
Vivitar point n shoot digi (mmm well...) |
|
   |
 |
jeffb
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 189
Location: Huntington, WV
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 8:33 am |
  |
Is "Raw Essentials" better than using the software that comes with the Canon or Nikon package? |
_________________ Canon 350D
Canon 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 kit lens
Canon 50mm f1.8
Sigma 70-300mm Super Macro II
Adobe CS2 |
|
  |
 |
Harpua

Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 160
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 8:33 am |
  |
I feel like I have been let in on a very well known secret if that makes any sense at all. |
Last edited by Harpua on Mon May 01, 2006 8:37 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
   |
 |
PeterRoweBlackman
Moderator

Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 3619
Location: Warrington, Cheshire, England
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 8:35 am |
  |
| Harpua wrote: |
| I feel like I have been let in on a very well know secret if that makes any sense at all. |
It does
PRB
B-) |
_________________ Nikon D80+grip
Nikon D50+grip
Nikon 18-70,
Nikon 50mm f1.8,
Sigma 70-300mmD 1:4-5.6APO,
Nikon SB600 (2 of)
Various accessories
Pentax MX + 50mmf1.7 + 70-150mm
Vivitar point n shoot digi (mmm well...) |
|
   |
 |
Harpua

Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 160
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 8:36 am |
  |
| jeffb wrote: |
| Is "Raw Essentials" better than using the software that comes with the Canon or Nikon package? |
I did not have much luck with the Nikon software, but to be fair I did not give it a lot of time and was just sort of playing with a test shot of nothing.
Raw Essentials was super easy to use. I was able to edit about 100 shots in a very short amount of time and I was able to do a lot with them. |
|
|
   |
 |
jeffb
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 189
Location: Huntington, WV
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 9:11 am |
  |
Would it be worth purchasing, or should I just stick to Adobe CS2 and RAW essentials?[/quote] |
|
|
  |
 |
Cid
Premium Member

Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 872
Location: Lansing, MI / Columbus, Ohio @ Ohio State University
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 9:24 am |
  |
I think Camera Raw in CS2 is best if you have it. Simply because it streamlines everything into Adobe nice and easily. That and it is a very versitile add-on.
However I have heard a lot of people that love RAW essentials so I would say give that a shot if you dont have CS2. |
_________________ Olympus E-500
14-45mm f3.5-5.6 Lens
40-150mm f3.5-4.5 Lens |
|
  |
 |
Harpua

Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 160
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 9:33 am |
  |
Yeah the only reason I am using Raw Essentials is that I have Photoshop 7.0 and am not upgrading it so I don't have access to RAW in PS right now. |
|
|
   |
 |
Malissa
Premium Member

Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Posts: 545
Location: Central Illinois
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 12:50 pm |
  |
Amen to that! There is no going back now that I have seen the difference between shooting in RAW and jpeg. |
_________________ -Malissa
Canon Digital Rebel XT
lenses- 18-55mm & 50mm 1.8 |
|
    |
 |
ikd
Premium Member

Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 1146
Location: Essex, England
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 12:54 pm |
  |
|
    |
 |
Dustbuster

Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 98
Location: The Former United Kingdom
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 1:09 pm |
  |
so what's the big deal about RAW then, apart from it being the 'in' thing? |
_________________ “Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist” |
|
  |
 |
adorski
Premium Member

Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 3834
Location: North Hollywood California
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 1:16 pm |
  |
|
     |
 |
Dustbuster

Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 98
Location: The Former United Kingdom
|
Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 1:17 pm |
  |
Nope never. Heard about it obviously.
What are the practical advantages? |
_________________ “Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist” |
|
  |
 |
|
|