photography forum, digital photography, photo sharing, photography tips, digital camera review, photography techniques, photo contest
Home Forum FAQ Search Register Profile PM Inbox Login Links Gallery Articles Reviews Contact
Photography - Digital Camera - Nikon Digital - Canon Digital - Photography
 Leica Digital Modul R for the R8 & R9 View next topic
View previous topic
Post new topicReply to topic
Author Message
Shaun Lowe
Moderator


Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 2399
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia

PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2004 10:32 am Reply with quoteBack to top

Leica Digital Modul R for the R8 & R9

Leica has today announced the development of a Digital Module for the Leica R8 & R9. This new module has a ten megapixel Kodak sensor and has been developed in association with Imacon. The module is made up of two parts, a digital back which cliips onto the rear of the camera and a power unit which fits on the base. The digital back has a ten megapixel Kodak sensor which produces a FOV crop of 1.37x and has a sensitivity of ISO 100 to 800. Image formats will include RAW (Imacon 3F), storage by SD card.

Leica Digital Modul R Computer Generated Images

Image

Leica Digital Modul R Preliminary Specifcations

Type Interchangeable digital module, fully compatible with LEICA R8 and R9, can be exchanged by the photographer
Lenses All Leica R-lenses as well as those earlier LEICAFLEX/SL/SL2-lenses that have been modified by adding the R-cam can be used
Physical • One digital back part
• One battery power supply part
• Focusing screen with crop area marked
Price (street) 4500 EUR
Sensor • 10 million pixels
• 26.4 x 17.6 mm
• 6.8 µm pixel pitch (has microlenses)
• FOV crop 1.37x
• Kodak Sensor
• No anti-alias (blur) filter
Sensitivity • ISO 100 - 800
Storage SD card
Image formats • RAW (Imacon 3F format)
• TIFF (8 or 16 bit)
• JPEG
Image processing Developed by Imacon
B&W Display • Frame counter
• ISO
• Exposure compensation
• Battery status
• Flash ready
• Self-timer
• Compression rate
• Resolution
• Moire reduction on/off
Menu • Sharpness
• Color saturation
• Contrast
• Frame number
• Contrast of display
• Brightness of display
• Duration of auto review
• Histogram on/off
• Power save
• Card format
• Warning signals
• Audio histogram on/off
• Date & Time
• User profiles
• Firmware update
• Reset
Continuous shooting • 1.5 - 2.0 fps (unconfirmed)
• Buffer up to 10 images
Connectivity IEEE 1394 (Firewire)
Power supply • Proprietary Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery
• Battery charges in-camera
Dimensions 158 x 140 x 89 mm

_________________
Regards,

Shaun
shaunlowe.com
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website
ocos234



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 50
Location: uk - shropshire

PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2004 5:57 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

WOW! im glad its not good to take photos of mirrors cos they'll all break with that camera!

UGLY!

am i alone on this? that is an ugly camera.....
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailAIM AddressMSN Messenger
Shaun Lowe
Moderator


Joined: 12 Dec 2003
Posts: 2399
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia

PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2004 7:34 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Um. It's a Leica. Does it matter how it looks?

_________________
Regards,

Shaun
shaunlowe.com
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website
Mongoose
Premium Member


Joined: 09 Feb 2004
Posts: 1858
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2004 7:59 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

yeah no matter how ugly it may be, that little red logo says it all. Too bad none of us can afford it! and would it not be cool to just be able to switch to digital just like changing a film?

_________________
Please feel free to edit and repost my photos for critique purposes, and be as harsh as you like in critique, I don't bite but I'd like to learn!

Pentax K10D and *istDL2 with an assortment of Pentax, Tamron and Zeiss glassware.
View user's profileSend private message
walter23
Premium Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2004
Posts: 5585
Location: 127.0.0.1

PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:38 am Reply with quoteBack to top

Is that a film-advance lever on your fancy dSLR, sir?

_________________
Walter
http://ashphotography.ca
Here's a good photography discussion forum: http://l i g h t c a f e . n e t

Monoton und minimal, meine welt is ganz total, alles was ich will ist da, monoton und minimal.
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
ChrisL
Premium Member


Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 5395
Location: Chicago, IL

PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:38 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Would be nice if the other MFG's could see as clearly as leica.

_________________
Earn money working from home - click here to find out how
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM AddressMSN Messenger
parallaxkid



Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Posts: 211
Location: California

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 11:15 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

ocos234 wrote:
WOW! im glad its not good to take photos of mirrors cos they'll all break with that camera!

UGLY!

am i alone on this? that is an ugly camera.....


Its not ugly. Although you could put a pink bow or two on it...maybe that would make it better?

_________________
-Brian
Sunburst Photography
www.sunburstphoto.com

"You must be the change you wish to see in the world"-Gandhi
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM AddressYahoo MessengerMSN MessengerICQ Number
TradClimber
Premium Member


Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 1131
Location: Dupont, WA *Call me Andy*

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:33 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Mongoose wrote:
yeah no matter how ugly it may be, that little red logo says it all. Too bad none of us can afford it! and would it not be cool to just be able to switch to digital just like changing a film?


I was thinking the same thing about the logo to....Pretty cool idea to be able to do this with a camera. Like the new Hybrid cars out there.

_________________
Andy
Nikon D200 plus toys!
Newest addition: Nikon F5- Back to film!!
Here in the Great State of WA.
No such thing as bad weather, only inappropriate clothing!
View user's profileSend private messageYahoo Messenger
kal99



Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 12:03 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Even if I could afford it, I wouldn't buy it. I dont do studio photos, just walk-around type photography. I couldn't imgaine walking around with that thing around my neck!
View user's profileSend private message
The Mad Jester



Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:02 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

ohman. droolface. DROOLFAAACEE.

_________________
www . viovio . com
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
myrllie



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 10:25 am Reply with quoteBack to top

Whats ugly got to do with it.. If its a camera I'll take it..
View user's profileSend private message
Timmynoshoes



Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 1016
Location: Newcastle, UK

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:29 am Reply with quoteBack to top

kal99 wrote:
Even if I could afford it, I wouldn't buy it. I dont do studio photos, just walk-around type photography. I couldn't imgaine walking around with that thing around my neck!


This thread is like 2 years old :P

_________________
Tim

Be honest in feedback, i wont get offended, honest!

Please do familiarise yourself with this link http://www.phototakers.com/forum/search.php

Nikon D70s | 28-100 | 75-300
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic


 Jump to:   



View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Copyright © 2004 PhotoTakers.com All rights reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group