| Author |
Message |
Nicollett
Joined: 20 Feb 2004
Posts: 2
|
 Posted:
Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:13 pm |
  |
|
   |
|
rosajg
Joined: 29 Sep 2003
Posts: 616
Location: Central CA
|
| Posted:
Fri Feb 20, 2004 3:37 pm |
|
Don't know the answer to your question...but i took a look at that pic and it is definitely either a product of double exposure or it was doctored up in photoshop using the clone tool to clone the same cone shape object all over the photo.
Rosanna |
|
|
   |
|
nighthawk
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 113
|
| Posted:
Fri Feb 20, 2004 4:09 pm |
|
The first picture looks like a lens flare.
The second picture down the page doesn't -- I am not sure what that is. |
|
|
|
|
Nicollett
Joined: 20 Feb 2004
Posts: 2
|
| Posted:
Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:01 pm |
|
Thanks for the responses. The picture (acutally this lady has many on the site with the orb issue) were taken with a digital camera. Can you have a double exposure with digital? |
|
|
|
|
brian
Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 24
|
| Posted:
Fri Feb 20, 2004 10:57 pm |
|
From what I've seen of orbs, they are always an occurance when the on-camera flash is involved. I think the flash is illuminating dust particles or water droplets/vapor. Or it's a ghost :P |
|
|
|
|
|
|
