photography forum, digital photography, photo sharing, photography tips, digital camera review, photography techniques, photo contest
Home Forum FAQ Search Register Profile PM Inbox Login Links Gallery Articles Reviews Contact
Photography - Digital Camera - Nikon Digital - Canon Digital - Photography
 optical slave View next topic
View previous topic
Post new topicReply to topic
Author Message
bellybabe
Premium Member


Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 1016
Location: ottawa canada

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 8:41 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

I'm embarrassed of my lack of knowledge but ...
What is an optical slave?
A slave flash is on my to-buy list in order to light up my white backdrops. I thought that I would reduce my on-camera flash(which I don't normally use) down to the lowest power and that would still trigger the flash for the backdrop.
Do I need an optical flash?
Am I on the right track?
signed,
confused

_________________
"Creativity is allowing oneself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep."
- Scott Adams, The Dilbert Principle

Canon Digital Rebel XT
Canon EFS 17-85mm IS Lens
http://photobucket.com/albums/c378/bellybeautiful/
View user's profileSend private message
lazarus219
Premium Member


Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 4903
Location: Australia,

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 9:06 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Simple answer,
An optical slave is a slave that will respond to a quick change in light (like another flash going off) and fire the flash connected to it in sync.

I think it could work in a studio using flash only, if there is too much constant light the slave won't pick up the change and hence won't fire.

If you have a hot shoe/pc sync on your camera radio slaves are by far the better way to go, and more reliable (especially i you'd like to use outdoor flash)

_________________
The forum young'un!
My Photo Gallery
click here
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteMSN Messenger
packard
Premium Member


Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Posts: 7581
Location: Somewhere, lost in time

PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 8:23 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Radio slaves became important to wedding photographers when they started using a second light and the guests kept triggering the optical slave before they got the shot.

In other situations, optical slaves seem to work just fine. I've used them outdoors in bright sunlight. Battery powered ones are more sensitive and can trigger the slave more reliably if the slave is not in the line of fire with the triggering flash.

You can get an optical slave to give a false trigger by quickly moving it from a shaded area to bright sun. I've had that happen a couple of times. Mostly they work just fine, indoors and out. Cheap an reliable. Buy a radio slave if the optical ones fail you.

_________________
Packard, out.

Feel free to edit my posts for grammar and spelling, but not in PhotoShop.

-----------------------------------------------

Dream no small dreams for they have no power to move the hearts of men.

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
View user's profileSend private message
adorski
Premium Member


Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 3833
Location: North Hollywood California

PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:25 am Reply with quoteBack to top

If I have a choice I will go for a RF (Radio Frequency) remote flash than Optical one....

with the Optical, the slave need to see the flash to be triggered while the Radio Transmitted flash doesn't need to see it and it can be useful specially at event where there's a lot of distraction or thing that block the slave flash....

_________________
D70s l D200
Nikkor Lens AF 50mm f/1.4D l AF-S 28-70mm f/2.8D l AF-S 70-200 f/2.8 VR l TC 17EII
AF-S 12-24mm f/4G DX l AF-S 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G DX l AF-S 55-200mm f/4-5.6G DX
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM AddressYahoo Messenger
packard
Premium Member


Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Posts: 7581
Location: Somewhere, lost in time

PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:33 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

A peanut slave costs $30.00.

A radio slave costs $350.00.

In most cases the peanut will work fine. In cases where the peanut is not in the line of fire and does not trigger, then I put it on a long PC cord and place the peanut in the line of fire.

So, for $45.00 I have managed just fine without the radio slave.

If I shot weddings with a remote strobe I would definitely get a radio slave so that the guests would not be triggering my flashes.

You can go out and have a nice dinner on the town for the $300.00 that you save by sticking with the optical slaves.

_________________
Packard, out.

Feel free to edit my posts for grammar and spelling, but not in PhotoShop.

-----------------------------------------------

Dream no small dreams for they have no power to move the hearts of men.

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic


 Jump to:   



View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Copyright © 2004 PhotoTakers.com All rights reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group