| Author |
Message |
Mavrick
Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 7
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 27, 2005 9:08 pm |
  |
Hey all just looking for a little advice iv seen a few forums posts about the nikon D70 vs the canon rebel XT but nothing about the D70s, iv done plenty of reseach on both the Rebel XT and the nikon D70s but still cant decied i kinda like the butten location and interface on the D70s but havent gotten to play with the Rebel XT to to much :( so anyone who has owned or played with both have any opionen on the pros and cons of both i guess im leaning torward the Rebel XT but only because it has 8.0 magepixels thanks for any advice you can offer i was also looking for pros and cons on which company makes better lenses but through lots of google searchs could'nt find any so anyways thanks again.. also i will be trevaling around alot my family wants to travel the united stats so i will probibly be taking alot of landscape shots and sunsets and that kinda thing.. |
|
|
  |
 |
KurtSchneid
Premium Member

Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 4454
Location: North Boston, NY
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:08 pm |
  |
Just look at any of the other 10 threads or so started on the same subject within the past 60 days. |
_________________ Nikons film n digital n infrared |
|
    |
 |
Mavrick
Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 7
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 27, 2005 11:18 pm |
  |
as i said before i did look at the other ones but they where all about the D70 not the D70s there is a difference just wanted to know if anyone thougth different.... cause one is a newer version.. |
|
|
  |
 |
andrewshalin
Premium Member
Joined: 21 Nov 2005
Posts: 679
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 27, 2005 11:20 pm |
  |
|
  |
 |
TradClimber
Premium Member

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 1132
Location: Dupont, WA *Call me Andy*
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 27, 2005 11:44 pm |
  |
| Mavrick wrote: |
| as i said before i did look at the other ones but they where all about the D70 not the D70s there is a difference just wanted to know if anyone thougth different.... cause one is a newer version.. |
The D70s is a newer version but really only adds a few features such as a bigger display and port for a cable release. The menus are different but they are available to the D70 with a firmware upgrade. Andrew has provided an excellent link which has a table with the D70, D70s and D50. Compare the features and you'll see the 70 and 70s are almost the exact same. |
_________________ Andy
Nikon D200 plus toys!
Newest addition: Nikon F5- Back to film!!
Here in the Great State of WA.
No such thing as bad weather, only inappropriate clothing! |
|
   |
 |
luisv
Premium Member

Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 1705
Location: Miami, Florida
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 27, 2005 11:50 pm |
  |
The D70 and D70s are basically the same for the purposes of the posts here. As mentioned, the differences are not huge and the camera spec is basically the same. Again, for the posts you see here....... |
_________________ Luis
Nikon D2X User
Nikon 17-35mm AF-S f/2.8 | 28-70mm AF-S f2.8 | 70-200mm AF-S f/2.8 | 50mm f/1.4D | 85mm f/1.4D| 105mm f/2.8 Macro
DON'T Feel Free to edit my shots. DO feel free to tell me anything you'd like though. |
|
   |
 |
Mavrick
Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 7
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 28, 2005 12:25 am |
  |
yeah iv read that review already i read all i could find i guess i was just looking for personal opionen from someone who has used both cameras and what there thoughts were but o well thanks for trying i appricate it. |
|
|
  |
 |
luisv
Premium Member

Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 1705
Location: Miami, Florida
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 28, 2005 7:20 am |
  |
|
   |
 |
Mavrick
Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 7
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:12 am |
  |
awesome luisv thanks for the info :) no one ever says anything about the difference in megapixals buts doesnt it make a differance when editing say if you wanna crop the picture or you see something that you would like to zoom in on? i am planing on buying the XT but onl because everyone and every review i read says there pretty much the same camera but one has the 8.0 magepixels. anyways thanks again for the info guys even if i made a post that was the same as the other ones sorry :( (found a link that talked about the megapixals) |
|
|
  |
 |
drpablo74
Premium Member
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 5758
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 28, 2005 12:48 pm |
  |
For most purposes the difference in megapixels is negligible, but if you're cropping to 8x10 aspect ratio it may be a big deal. If you crop out 25% of the pixels, instead of talking about 8 versus 6 megapixels we're now talking about 6 versus 4.5 megapixels. Now I have a 300D, and I routinely make beautiful 8x10s with its 6 megapixels, so I think it's more in the 16x20 range of enlargements where you'll really see a difference. The difference in megapixels is one out of many factors, but shouldn't seal the deal unless you want big enlargments. The ISO difference seals the deal for me, though. |
|
|
  |
 |
Mavrick
Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 7
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:23 pm |
  |
alright thanks drpablo74 i guess that makes sence and i kina need the iso to go lower cause id rather not use the flash if i dont need to so thanks again all i guess im getting the canon rebel xt.. |
|
|
  |
 |
drpablo74
Premium Member
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 5758
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 28, 2005 1:38 pm |
  |
| Mavrick wrote: |
| alright thanks drpablo74 i guess that makes sence and i kina need the iso to go lower cause id rather not use the flash if i dont need to so thanks again all i guess im getting the canon rebel xt.. |
Well it's the other way around -- the higher ISOs (400, 800, 1600) are what allow you to shoot without flash, and both cameras are equivalent in that regard. The low ISO allows you to shoot with a wide aperture in bright conditions so that you have a shallow depth of field, and it allows you to take longer exposures without overexposing as well. Some cameras, like the Kodak DSC-Pro go down to an ISO of 6, and frankly the Canon should go down to 50 or 20. So the low ISO of 100 won't help you with flash-free photography, but it will help you with long exposures and shallow depth of field.
That aside, coming from a Canon lover, the XT is a great camera and you'll love it. The D70s is as well. You won't go wrong either way. |
|
|
  |
 |
Mavrick
Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 7
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 28, 2005 3:14 pm |
  |
oops i guess i read it wrong im sorry new at this :( thanks for the info good to know.. |
|
|
  |
 |
drpablo74
Premium Member
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 5758
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:40 pm |
  |
No prob, it's a steep learning curve :) |
|
|
  |
 |
Film not guns

Joined: 16 Oct 2005
Posts: 938
Location: Muskoka ONT CAN
|
Posted:
Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:19 am |
  |
Pick the two camera's up and try em out in the store..
The quality in the D70s over the xt was what sealed the deal for me. |
_________________ http://www.alijabos.blogspot.com < some of my photo's
80-200 2.8 has arrived =)
Nikon D700s
Nikkor 6-700mm f1.8 VR ED
SanDisk UltraXXI 1terrabyte 999xxxx CF Card |
|
    |
 |
|
|